Radeon Instinct MI250 vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1380not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.89no data
Architectureno dataCDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameMCP79MXAldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1613312
Core clock speed450 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,414
Floating-point processing powerno data45.26 TFLOPS
TMUsno data832
L1 Cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data128 GB
Memory bus widthno data8192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,277 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 October 2008 8 November 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 500 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 4066.7% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Radeon Instinct MI250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI250 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
Radeon Instinct MI250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon Instinct MI250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.