Radeon Instinct MI250 vs GeForce 9800M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1162not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.06no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameG92Aldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9613312
Core clock speed500 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors754 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate24.001,414
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS45.26 TFLOPS
Gigaflops360no data
ROPs16no data
TMUs48832
L1 Cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 Cache64 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 500 Watt

9800M GT has 669.2% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GT and Radeon Instinct MI250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GT is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI250 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GeForce 9800M GT
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
Radeon Instinct MI250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 19 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GT or Radeon Instinct MI250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.