GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Place in the ranking	1324	57
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.79	30.49
Architecture	no data	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	MCP79MX	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	14 October 2008 (16 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	4608
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	282 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	244.1
Floating-point processing power	no data	15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	48
TMUs	no data	144
Tensor Cores	no data	144
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) 0.30

RTX 4070 Mobile 49.00
+16233%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) 607

RTX 4070 Mobile 94245
+15426%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	128
1440p	-0−1	74
4K	-0−1	47

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1311%	127 +1311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4333%	133 +4333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1133%	111 +1133%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1833%	58 +1833%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −4650%	285 +4650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2275%	95−100 +2275%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −944%	94 +944%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1533%	49 +1533%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1617%	103 +1617%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −3783%	233 +3783%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −3467%	210−220 +3467%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2275%	95−100 +2275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3380%	170−180 +3380%
World of Tanks	12−14 −2046%	270−280 +2046%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −822%	83 +822%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1367%	44 +1367%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1717%	100−110 +1717%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −3283%	203 +3283%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −3467%	210−220 +3467%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−8650%

170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −800%	27 +800%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3850%	150−160 +3850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2100%	88 +2100%
Valorant	4−5 −4425%	180−190 +4425%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −329%	30 +329%
Dota 2	14−16 −500%	90 +500%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −493%	89 +493%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −17300%	170−180 +17300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −493%	89 +493%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	60−65
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −57.1%	11 +57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −500%	12 +500%
Dota 2	14−16 −873%	146 +873%
Valorant	0−1	100−105

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	160 +0%	160 +0%
Metro Exodus	140 +0%	140 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	156 +0%	156 +0%
Fortnite	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	145 +0%	145 +0%
Metro Exodus	111 +0%	111 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	167 +0%	167 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	121 +0%	121 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	89 +0%	89 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
World of Tanks	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	134 +0%	134 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	105 +0%	105 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus	44 +0%	44 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Fortnite	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	72 +0%	72 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 Mobile is 17300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.30	49.00
Recency	14 October 2008	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	65 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	115 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 858.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 16233.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.