GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) with GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, including specs and performance data.

9400M (G) / ION (LE)
2008
12 Watt
0.29

RTX 3050 OEM outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 9714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1386225
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8616.81
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMCP79MXGA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed450 MHz1515 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rateno data140.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.986 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9567%
290−300
+9567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9186%
650−700
+9186%
Valorant 24−27
−9708%
2550−2600
+9708%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−9515%
1250−1300
+9515%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%
Dota 2 9−10
−9344%
850−900
+9344%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9567%
290−300
+9567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9186%
650−700
+9186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Valorant 24−27
−9708%
2550−2600
+9708%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%
Dota 2 9−10
−9344%
850−900
+9344%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9567%
290−300
+9567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9186%
650−700
+9186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Valorant 24−27
−9708%
2550−2600
+9708%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−9567%
290−300
+9567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−9567%
290−300
+9567%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−9400%
190−200
+9400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−9543%
1350−1400
+9543%
Valorant 2−3
−9400%
190−200
+9400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−9400%
190−200
+9400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 28.46
Recency 14 October 2008 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 130 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 983.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 OEM, on the other hand, has a 9713.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 207 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.