Radeon HD 8310E vs GeForce 9400

Place in the ranking	1357	1129
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.43	2.41
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	C79	Kalindi
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	17 April 2007 (17 years ago)	23 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	128
Core clock speed	450 MHz	300 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	2.400
Floating-point processing power	0.0352 TFLOPS	0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	8	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCI	IGP
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	4.0	6.3
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 9400 0.25

HD 8310E 0.88
+252%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 9400 98

HD 8310E 340
+247%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.25	0.88
Recency	17 April 2007	23 April 2013
Chip lithography	65 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	25 Watt

HD 8310E has a 252% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 8310E is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8310E is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.