ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 vs GeForce 9400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1349not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.67no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameC79M88
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 June 2008 (17 years ago)4 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16320 ×2
Core clock speed450 MHz580 MHz
Number of transistors314 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6009.280 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS0.3712 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs416 ×2
TMUs816 ×2
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 70 Watt

GeForce 9400 has 75% lower power consumption.

ATI Mobility HD 3850 X2, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 and Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400
GeForce 9400
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2
Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 16 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 or Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.