GeForce 9400 GT vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.72
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameM88G96C
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)27 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320 ×216
Core clock speed580 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors666 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate9.280 ×24.400
Floating-point processing power0.3712 TFLOPS ×20.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×24
TMUs16 ×28
L2 Cache256 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s ×212.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 27 August 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 50 Watt

9400 GT has an age advantage of 2 months, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 and GeForce 9400 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2
Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
GeForce 9400 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 533 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 or GeForce 9400 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.