Radeon RX Vega 9 vs GeForce 9400 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9400 GT 9400 GT PCI 9400 GT Rev. 2 9500 GS Rev. 2 9500 GT Mac Edition 9500 GT Rev. 3 G210 OEM GT 120 Mac Edition GT 120 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 3 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400 GT with Radeon RX Vega 9, including specs and performance data.

9400 GT
2008, $80
512 MB DDR2, 50 Watt
0.46

RX Vega 9 outperforms 9400 GT by a whopping 989% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9400 GT 9400 GT
RX Vega 9 RX Vega 9

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1302670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.7125.88
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG96CVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 August 2008 (17 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16576
Core clock speed550 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.400no data
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p79.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 22
+0%
22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how 9400 GT and RX Vega 9 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 9 is 1700% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.46 5.01
Recency 27 August 2008 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 9 has a 989.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 9 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
GeForce 9400 GT
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
ATI HD 4570 Radeon HD 4570
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
vs
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
9500 GT GeForce 9500 GT
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4850 Mac Edition Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Mac Edition
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
GT 710 PCI GeForce GT 710 PCI
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
HD 7560G IGP Radeon HD 7560G IGP
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
Arc 7 A770M Arc 7 A770M
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
615 OEM GeForce 615 OEM
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
vs
RTX 5090 D V2 GeForce RTX 5090 D V2
9500 GT GeForce 9500 GT
vs
ION 2 ION 2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 523 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.