Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce 930MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 930MX and Radeon R7 M365X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 930MX
2016
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 17 Watt
3.32
+63.5%

930MX outperforms R7 M365X by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking747894
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.47no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGM108Litho
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2016 (8 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Compute unitsno data6
Core clock speed952 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistorsno data690 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.4823.04
Floating-point processing power0.7834 TFLOPS0.7373 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.1.126-
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 930MX 3.32
+63.5%
R7 M365X 2.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 930MX 1282
+63.3%
R7 M365X 785

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+100%
4−5
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Battlefield 5 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Fortnite 37
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+70%
10−11
−70%
Valorant 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Battlefield 5 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Dota 2 36
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Fortnite 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 2
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Valorant 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Dota 2 33
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Valorant 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Valorant 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how GeForce 930MX and R7 M365X compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 930MX is 78% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.32 2.03
Recency 1 March 2016 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB

GeForce 930MX has a 63.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

R7 M365X, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce 930MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M365X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GeForce 930MX
AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon R7 M365X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 413 votes

Rate GeForce 930MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 55 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 930MX or Radeon R7 M365X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.