Radeon HD 6530M vs GeForce 930MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 930MX and Radeon HD 6530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 930MX
2016
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 17 Watt
2.90
+166%

930MX outperforms HD 6530M by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7891092
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.733.37
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGM108Capilano
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2016 (9 years ago)26 November 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384400
Core clock speed952 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data627 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt26 Watt
Texture fill rate24.489.000
Floating-point processing power0.7834 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2420
L1 Cache192 KB40 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-II
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 930MX 2.90
+166%
HD 6530M 1.09

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 930MX 8062
+142%
HD 6530M 3334

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+167%
6−7
−167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Fortnite 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Forza Horizon 5 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Valorant 45−50
+45.5%
30−35
−45.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 36
+125%
16−18
−125%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Fortnite 15
+650%
2−3
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 12 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 2
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 45−50
+45.5%
30−35
−45.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 33
+106%
16−18
−106%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Valorant 45−50
+45.5%
30−35
−45.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%
Valorant 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how GeForce 930MX and HD 6530M compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 930MX is 167% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 930MX is 1750% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6530M is 17% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 930MX performs better in 44 tests (94%)
  • HD 6530M performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 1.09
Recency 1 March 2016 26 November 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 26 Watt

GeForce 930MX has a 166.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 52.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 930MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6530M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GeForce 930MX
AMD Radeon HD 6530M
Radeon HD 6530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 460 votes

Rate GeForce 930MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 930MX or Radeon HD 6530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.