Radeon HD 5670 vs GeForce 930MX

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GeForce 930MX
2016
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5
3.34
+61.4%

GeForce 930MX outperforms Radeon HD 5670 by 61% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking700830
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.080.10
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN16S-GMRRedwood
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 March 2016 (8 years ago)14 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$119
Current price$1808 $132 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 5670 has 25% better value for money than GeForce 930MX.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384400
Core clock speed952 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data627 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt64 Watt
Texture fill rate24.4815.50
Floating-point performance783.4 gflops620.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 930MX and Radeon HD 5670 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+no data
GameWorks+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 930MX 3.34
+61.4%
ATI HD 5670 2.07

GeForce 930MX outperforms Radeon HD 5670 by 61% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 930MX 1294
+61.1%
ATI HD 5670 803

GeForce 930MX outperforms Radeon HD 5670 by 61% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 930MX 8062
+22.4%
ATI HD 5670 6584

GeForce 930MX outperforms Radeon HD 5670 by 22% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 930MX 2202
+50%
ATI HD 5670 1468

GeForce 930MX outperforms Radeon HD 5670 by 50% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
+53.8%
26
−53.8%
Full HD16
−100%
32
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8
+60%
5−6
−60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 15
+400%
3−4
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 11
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Hitman 3 12
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 12
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Hitman 3 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 2
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hitman 3 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how GeForce 930MX and ATI HD 5670 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 930MX is 53.8% faster than ATI HD 5670 in 900p
  • ATI HD 5670 is 100% faster than GeForce 930MX in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 930MX is 1000% faster than the ATI HD 5670.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI HD 5670 is 50% faster than the GeForce 930MX.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 930MX is ahead in 42 tests (89%)
  • ATI HD 5670 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.34 2.07
Recency 10 March 2016 14 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 64 Watt

The GeForce 930MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5670 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 930MX is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5670 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GeForce 930MX
ATI Radeon HD 5670
Radeon HD 5670

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 334 votes

Rate GeForce 930MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 378 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.