Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce 930MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 930MX with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 930MX
2016
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 17 Watt
3.33

RTX 6000 outperforms 930MX by a whopping 1355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking73969
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.32
Power efficiency13.4312.78
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM108TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2016 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844608
Core clock speed952 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate24.48509.8
Floating-point processing power0.7834 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 930MX 3.33
RTX 6000 48.46
+1355%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 930MX 1285
RTX 6000 18674
+1353%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 930MX 5525
RTX 6000 148896
+2595%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GeForce 930MX 3967
RTX 6000 126987
+3101%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GeForce 930MX 5566
RTX 6000 159550
+2767%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−1300%
210−220
+1300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data30.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Far Cry New Dawn 15
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1321%
270−280
+1321%
Hitman 3 8
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Metro Exodus 15
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−1285%
180−190
+1285%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1285%
180−190
+1285%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1275%
550−600
+1275%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Far Cry New Dawn 6
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1321%
270−280
+1321%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Metro Exodus 6
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−1352%
450−500
+1352%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1275%
550−600
+1275%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1321%
270−280
+1321%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1275%
550−600
+1275%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−1350%
290−300
+1350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

This is how GeForce 930MX and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 1300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.33 48.46
Recency 1 March 2016 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 260 Watt

GeForce 930MX has 1429.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 1355.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 930MX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 930MX is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GeForce 930MX
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 386 votes

Rate GeForce 930MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 130 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.