GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs 930A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 930A with GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 930A
2015
2 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
2.91

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms 930A by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking821745
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.792.90
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM108GF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)15 March 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed928 MHz783 MHz
Boost clock speed941 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate22.5825.06
Floating-point processing power0.7227 TFLOPS0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432
L1 Cache192 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz902 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s57.73 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.02.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.91 3.99
Recency 13 March 2015 15 March 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 106 Watt

GeForce 930A has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 221% lower power consumption.

GTS 450 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 37% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 930A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 930A is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 18 votes

Rate GeForce 930A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 42 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 930A or GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.