Radeon RX 6650M XT vs GeForce 9300M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9300M GS and Radeon RX 6650M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9300M GS
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.31

6650M XT outperforms 9300M GS by a whopping 13068% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1388114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8326.17
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG98Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speed550 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2416 MHz
Number of transistors210 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400309.2
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache16 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9300M GS 0.31
RX 6650M XT 40.82
+13068%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9300M GS 128
Samples: 498
RX 6650M XT 17070
+13236%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1860%
95−100
+1860%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3875%
150−160
+3875%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1860%
95−100
+1860%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2171%
150−160
+2171%
Valorant 24−27
−808%
230−240
+808%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1893%
270−280
+1893%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Dota 2 9−10
−1522%
140−150
+1522%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3875%
150−160
+3875%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1860%
95−100
+1860%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2171%
150−160
+2171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Valorant 24−27
−808%
230−240
+808%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Dota 2 9−10
−1522%
140−150
+1522%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3875%
150−160
+3875%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1860%
95−100
+1860%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2171%
150−160
+2171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Valorant 24−27
−808%
230−240
+808%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3433%
100−110
+3433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 290−300
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−11800%
110−120
+11800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−557%
90−95
+557%
Valorant 2−3
−12450%
250−260
+12450%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5700%
55−60
+5700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 12450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT performs better in 30 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 40.82
Recency 4 June 2008 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 120 Watt

9300M GS has 823.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has a 13067.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M GS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 165 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 78 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M GS or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.