GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs 9300M G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9300M G and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9300M G
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.19

5050 Mobile outperforms 9300M G by a whopping 18837% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1434132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1857.94
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameG86GB207
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2008 (17 years ago)24 June 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed400 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200201.6
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS12.9 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cache16 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.112.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9300M G 0.19
RTX 5050 Mobile 35.98
+18837%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9300M G 84
Samples: 50
RTX 5050 Mobile 15912
+18843%
Samples: 138

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−180
1440p-0−143

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4833%
140−150
+4833%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2071%
150−160
+2071%
Valorant 24−27
−800%
220−230
+800%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2217%
270−280
+2217%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Dota 2 9−10
−18789%
1700−1750
+18789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4833%
140−150
+4833%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2071%
150−160
+2071%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2620%
130−140
+2620%
Valorant 24−27
−800%
220−230
+800%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Dota 2 9−10
−18789%
1700−1750
+18789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4833%
140−150
+4833%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2071%
150−160
+2071%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2620%
130−140
+2620%
Valorant 24−27
−18700%
4700−4750
+18700%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−17400%
350−400
+17400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 70−75

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−453%
80−85
+453%
Valorant 1−2
−23400%
230−240
+23400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5100%
50−55
+5100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 144
+0%
144
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 23400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile performs better in 25 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (57%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 35.98
Recency 1 February 2008 24 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 50 Watt

9300M G has 284.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 5050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 18836.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9300M G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 109 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M G or GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.