GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs 920MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 920MX and GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 920MX
2016
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 16 Watt
2.64

RTX 5070 Mobile outperforms 920MX by a whopping 1908% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking84364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.9276.98
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGM108GB206
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 March 2016 (9 years ago)April 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564608
Core clock speed965 MHz907 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate23.83205.2
Floating-point processing power0.5084 TFLOPS13.13 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs24144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 920MX 2.64
RTX 5070 Mobile 53.02
+1908%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 920MX 1067
RTX 5070 Mobile 21389
+1905%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−1844%
350−400
+1844%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Fortnite 21
−1805%
400−450
+1805%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
Valorant 40−45
−1832%
850−900
+1832%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−1900%
1000−1050
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Dota 2 36
−1844%
700−750
+1844%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Fortnite 15
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Valorant 40−45
−1832%
850−900
+1832%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Dota 2 34
−1812%
650−700
+1812%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Valorant 40−45
−1832%
850−900
+1832%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 11
−1900%
220−230
+1900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1742%
350−400
+1742%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1844%
350−400
+1844%
Valorant 24−27
−1775%
450−500
+1775%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Dead Island 2 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
Valorant 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Dead Island 2 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Dota 2 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%

This is how GeForce 920MX and RTX 5070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 1844% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.64 53.02
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 920MX has 212.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1908.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920MX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GeForce 920MX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1122 votes

Rate GeForce 920MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 31 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 920MX or GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.