AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 895$
Games supported 58%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
  • Core clock speed 954
  • Max video memory 4096
  • Memory type DDR3
  • Memory clock speed 1800
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 80$
Games supported 58%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating788779
Value for money0.030.24
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.2 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameN16V-GM-SBristol Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 January 2015
(8 years old)
1 June 2016
(6 years old)
Current price$895 $80
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed954 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors915 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)33 Watt12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate30.53no data
Floating-point performance297.6 gflopsno data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce 920M and Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+no data
GameWorks+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA+no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 920M 1.85
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1.92
+3.8%
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 920M 728
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 754
+3.6%

Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms GeForce 920M by 4% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 920M 5587
+0.3%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 5568

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

GeForce 920M 1719
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1852
+7.8%

Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms GeForce 920M by 8% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

GeForce 920M 1048
+21%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 866

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) by 21% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

GeForce 920M 1162
+14.7%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1013

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) by 15% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

GeForce 920M 7242
+36.4%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 5311

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) by 36% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GeForce 920M 90619
+73.4%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 52246

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) by 73% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce 920M and Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge). Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 40 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+6.7%
15
−6.7%
4K9no data

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+433%
3−4
−433%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+400%
3−4
−400%
Metro Exodus 2
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 1.85 1.92
Recency 27 January 2015 1 June 2016
Pipelines / CUDA cores 384 512
Thermal design power (TDP) 33 Watt 12 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M

and

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of GeForce 920M by AMD

The nearest GeForce 920M's AMD equivalent is Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics, which is faster by 1% and higher by 1 position in our performance rating.

AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 920M:

Competitors of Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)'s NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce 825M, which is faster by 4% and higher by 13 positions in our performance rating.

NVIDIA GeForce 825M GeForce 825M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge):

GeForce 825M 103.65
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) 100
GeForce 920M 96.35

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 706 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 38 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.