UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs GeForce 9200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8200M G mGPU Intel 9100M G mGPU Intel 9200M 9400M 9400M G G102M G205M ION
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G1 32EU Mobile G4 G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) G4 48EU Mobile G7 G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) G7 64EU Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9200M and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 9200M
2008
12 Watt
0.34

Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms 9200M by a whopping 738% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce 9200M GeForce 9200M
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1348819
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.208.83
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameC79Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)28 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1632
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600no data
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%
4K1−2
−800%
9
+800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4
+0%
4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2
+0%
2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GeForce 9200M and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 1200% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.34 2.85
Recency 15 October 2008 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 738.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 9200M GeForce 9200M
vs
GT 130M GeForce GT 130M
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
GeForce 9200M GeForce 9200M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5430 Mobility Radeon HD 5430
GeForce G205M G205M
vs
T500 Max-Q T500 Max-Q
GMA 3650 GMA 3650
vs
GMA 900 GMA 900
GMA 3650 GMA 3650
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation
GMA X4500M GMA X4500M
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
9100M G mGPU 9100M G mGPU Intel
vs
9500 GT Rev. 3 9500 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9200M 9200M
vs
RTX 2060 TU104 RTX 2060 TU104
GeForce 9200M 9200M
vs
T500 Max-Q T500 Max-Q
GeForce 9200M 9200M
vs
RTX 5070 Mobile RTX 5070 Mobile
GeForce 9400M 9400M
vs
ATI Xpress 200M Xpress 200M
GeForce 9400M 9400M
vs
ATI HD 5770 Mac Edition HD 5770 Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 395 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M or UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.