RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs GeForce 9200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9200M with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 9200M
2008
12 Watt
0.34

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms 9200M by a whopping 21000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.1878.84
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameC79GB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168960
Core clock speed450 MHz577 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1432 MHz
Number of transistors314 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600401.0
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS25.66 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cacheno data8.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 9200M 0.34
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 71.74
+21000%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 9200M 143
Samples: 51
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+20892%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 71.74
Recency 15 October 2008 11 August 2025
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 70 Watt

GeForce 9200M has 483.3% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 21000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.