RTX A500 Mobile vs GeForce 9200M GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated306
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.24
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG98GA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speed550 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1537 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate4.40098.37
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS6.296 TFLOPS
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs448
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9200M GS 121
RTX A500 Mobile 6767
+5493%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9200M GS 373
RTX A500 Mobile 40923
+10886%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 60 Watt

9200M GS has 361.5% lower power consumption.

RTX A500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and RTX A500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook graphics card while RTX A500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 28 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 87 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.