GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs 910M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 910M and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 910M
2015
DDR3 MB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.50

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 910M by a whopping 2333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking981132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.1922.29
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK208BGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed641 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors915 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate20.51249.6
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPS15.97 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs32160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 910M 1.50
RTX 3070 Mobile 36.50
+2333%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 910M 589
RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+2339%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 910M 1413
RTX 3070 Mobile 33996
+2306%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 910M 4325
RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+1684%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 910M 1022
RTX 3070 Mobile 25478
+2393%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 910M 6636
RTX 3070 Mobile 136558
+1958%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 910M 42738
RTX 3070 Mobile 510435
+1094%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−1189%
116
+1189%
1440p2−3
−3450%
71
+3450%
4K1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−4575%
187
+4575%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1425%
122
+1425%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3867%
119
+3867%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−3500%
144
+3500%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1175%
102
+1175%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3467%
107
+3467%
Fortnite 4−5
−3750%
150−160
+3750%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2263%
189
+2263%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−13900%
140
+13900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1280%
130−140
+1280%
Valorant 35−40
−497%
200−210
+497%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−2125%
89
+2125%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−6600%
134
+6600%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−963%
85
+963%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
−823%
270−280
+823%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2833%
88
+2833%
Dota 2 18−20
−622%
130
+622%
Fortnite 4−5
−3750%
150−160
+3750%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2250%
188
+2250%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−11700%
118
+11700%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−12400%
125
+12400%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4750%
97
+4750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1280%
130−140
+1280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2733%
170
+2733%
Valorant 35−40
−497%
200−210
+497%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−6200%
126
+6200%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−963%
85
+963%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2367%
74
+2367%
Dota 2 18−20
−567%
120
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1988%
167
+1988%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−10500%
106
+10500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1280%
130−140
+1280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1467%
94
+1467%
Valorant 35−40
−423%
183
+423%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−3750%
150−160
+3750%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2544%
230−240
+2544%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1650%
170−180
+1650%
Valorant 7−8
−3529%
254
+3529%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4450%
91
+4450%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4567%
140
+4567%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 78
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2000%
60−65
+2000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−453%
83
+453%
Valorant 8−9
−2875%
238
+2875%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 22
Dota 2 2−3
−5350%
109
+5350%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2450%
51
+2450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1333%
40−45
+1333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 119
+0%
119
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+0%
102
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 44
+0%
44
+0%

This is how GeForce 910M and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 1189% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 3450% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 4700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 13900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is ahead in 52 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.50 36.50
Recency 13 March 2015 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 125 Watt

GeForce 910M has 278.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2333.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 910M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 60 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1990 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 910M or GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.