HD Graphics 405 vs GeForce 9100M G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9100M G and HD Graphics 405, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9100M G
2008
0.20

HD Graphics 405 outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14571232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.86
Architectureno dataGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)1 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8128
Core clock speed450 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data6 Watt
Texture fill rateno data9.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1536 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−275%
15
+275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 24−27
−16%
27−30
+16%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 24−27
−16%
27−30
+16%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 24−27
−16%
27−30
+16%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how 9100M G and HD Graphics 405 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 405 is 275% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 405 is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 405 performs better in 23 tests (79%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 0.69
Recency 3 June 2008 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm

HD Graphics 405 has a 245% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 405 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9100M G
Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 281 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or HD Graphics 405, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.