GeForce4 448 Go vs GeForce 9100M G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9100M G and GeForce4 448 Go, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


9100M G
2008
0.20
+1900%

9100M G outperforms GeForce4 448 Go by a whopping 1900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14571573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataCelsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHNV18 A4
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)1 March 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed450 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.8
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX108.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9100M G 0.20
+1900%
GeForce4 448 Go 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9100M G 83
+1560%
Samples: 83
GeForce4 448 Go 5
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 0.01
Recency 3 June 2008 1 March 2002
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

9100M G has a 1900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9100M G is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 448 Go in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 448 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or GeForce4 448 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.