GeForce 9300M GS vs 9100M G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9100M G and GeForce 9300M GS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9100M G
2008
0.17

9300M GS outperforms 9100M G by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14241345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.63
Architectureno dataTesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHG98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)4 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores88
Core clock speed450 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0224 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data34
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-I

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9100M G 0.17
9300M GS 0.30
+76.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9100M G 68
9300M GS 118
+73.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 1−2
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9300M GS is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9300M GS is ahead in 14 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.30

9300M GS has a 76.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce 9300M GS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9100M G
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 164 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or GeForce 9300M GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.