RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GeForce 9100M G mGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated50
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.85
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC79AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores86144
Core clock speed450 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors314 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600417.6
Floating-point processing power0.0176 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data360.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 9 August 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 130 Watt

9100M G mGPU has 983.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 64 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.