Radeon 540 Mobile vs GeForce 9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1449not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.36no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameC78Lexa
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)26 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16512
Core clock speed500 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1124 MHz
Number of transistors210 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00035.97
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS1.151 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 26 March 2019
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 9100 has 25% lower power consumption.

540 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100 and Radeon 540 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9100 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 540 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100
GeForce 9100
AMD Radeon 540 Mobile
Radeon 540 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 20 votes

Rate GeForce 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate Radeon 540 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100 or Radeon 540 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.