GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs 7050 PV + nForce 630a

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated9
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.23
Power efficiencyno data24.60
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC68AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (18 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7168
Core clock speed425 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors112 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data220 Watt
Texture fill rate0.85554.4
Floating-point processing powerno data35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs180
TMUs2224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2006 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

RTX 4070 SUPER has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a
GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 10 votes

Rate GeForce 7050 PV nForce 630a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3333 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.