UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

Place in the ranking	881	646
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.08	no data
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code name	NB8E-GTX	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	19 November 2007 (17 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	32
Core clock speed	500 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

large

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTX SLI 2.05

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.73
+131%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8800M GTX SLI 6326

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644
+116%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −157%	18 +157%
1440p	10−12 −150%	25 +150%
4K	5−6 −140%	12 +140%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−150%

10
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −263%	27−30 +263%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −34.3%	47 +34.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −263%	27−30 +263%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −70%	17 +70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −22.9%	43 +22.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −263%	27−30 +263%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +80%	10 −80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −60%	16 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +50%	8 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−200%

12−14
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−80%

9−10
+80%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−200%

3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 +0%	11 +0%
Metro Exodus	22 +0%	22 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9 +0%	9 +0%
Metro Exodus	16 +0%	16 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

5−6

+0%

5−6

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

This is how 8800M GTX SLI and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 157% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 150% faster in 1440p
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 140% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 8800M GTX SLI is 80% faster.
in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

8800M GTX SLI is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 51 test (77%)
there's a draw in 13 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.05	4.73
Recency	19 November 2007	11 May 2021
Chip lithography	65 nm	10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 130.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.