ATI Radeon 9600 vs GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX SLI with Radeon 9600, including specs and performance data.

8800M GTX SLI
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
1.91
+2288%

8800M SLI outperforms 9600 by a whopping 2288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9491527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.130.51
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNB8E-GTXRV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed500 MHz324 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million60 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.296
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz189 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.048 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 9−10 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 0.08
Recency 19 November 2007 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 12 Watt

8800M GTX SLI has a 2288% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600, on the other hand, has 983% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9600 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 142 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTX SLI or Radeon 9600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.