Radeon Graphics vs GeForce 8800M GTS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTS with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

8800M GTS
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 50 Watt
0.92

Graphics outperforms 8800M GTS by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1192976
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Power efficiency1.429.47
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG92Renoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2007 (18 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64448
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors754 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate16.0042.00
Floating-point processing power0.16 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3228
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8800M GTS 0.92
Radeon Graphics 1.84
+100%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800M GTS 382
Samples: 36
Radeon Graphics 764
+100%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Valorant 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Valorant 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Valorant 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Valorant 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Valorant 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 1.84
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics has a 100% higher aggregate performance score, a 829% more advanced lithography process, and 233% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 19 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8544 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTS or Radeon Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.