ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 vs GeForce 8800M GTS

Place in the ranking	1108	1258
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.37	1.84
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	G92	M92
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 November 2007 (17 years ago)	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	80
Core clock speed	500 MHz	720 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	242 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	5.760
Floating-point processing power	0.16 TFLOPS	0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	32	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-HE	PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	4.0	4.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTS 0.99
+148%

ATI Mobility HD 5145 0.40

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8800M GTS 2552
+104%

ATI Mobility HD 5145 1248

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Fortnite	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
World of Tanks	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
World of Tanks	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Valorant	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the 8800M GTS is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

8800M GTS is ahead in 23 tests (72%)
there's a draw in 9 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.99	0.40
Recency	1 November 2007	7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt

8800M GTS has a 147.5% higher aggregate performance score.

ATI Mobility HD 5145, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8800M GTS is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5145 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.