GeForce GT 630 vs 8800 Ultra

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

8800 Ultra
2007
512MB GDDR3
1.66

GT 630 outperforms 8800 Ultra by a small 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking897883
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.030.08
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG80GF108
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 May 2007 (17 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 $99.99
Current price$235 (0.3x MSRP)$112 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 630 has 167% better value for money than 8800 Ultra.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12896
CUDA cores612no data
Core clock speed612 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors681 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate39.2 billion/sec12.96
Floating-point performance387.1 gflops311.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length270 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1080 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800 Ultra 1.66
GT 630 1.75
+5.4%

GT 630 outperforms 8800 Ultra by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

8800 Ultra 642
GT 630 679
+5.8%

GT 630 outperforms 8800 Ultra by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 1.75
Recency 2 May 2007 15 May 2012
Cost $829 $99.99
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 65 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 8800 Ultra and GeForce GT 630.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GeForce GT 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2478 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.