ATI FirePro V3800 vs GeForce 8800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1014not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG80Redwood
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 May 2007 (19 years ago)26 April 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 $129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores612400
Core clock speed612 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors681 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate39.1713.00
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs3220
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cache96 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length270 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1080 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2007 26 April 2010
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 43 Watt

ATI V3800 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 298% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 Ultra and FirePro V3800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V3800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 35 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 53 votes

Rate FirePro V3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 Ultra or FirePro V3800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.