Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm vs GeForce 8800 GTX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking973not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.68no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG80GS-250nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 November 2006 (18 years ago)4 March 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores575no data
Core clock speed576 MHz147 MHz
Number of transistors681 million54 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt79 Watt
Texture fill rate36.861.176
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2416
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length270 mm302 mm
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount768 MB4 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit2560 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2006 4 March 2000
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 4 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 250 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 79 Watt

8800 GTX has an age advantage of 6 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 177.8% more advanced lithography process.

Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm, on the other hand, has 96.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTX and Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX
Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm
Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 140 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.