GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs 7900 GTO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.65
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG71G94
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2006 (18 years ago)23 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed650 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors278 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt90 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate15.6015.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.156 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options-2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoTwo Dual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2006 23 October 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 90 Watt

7900 GTO has 11.1% lower power consumption.

9600 GSO 512, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GTO and GeForce 9600 GSO 512. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO
GeForce 7900 GTO
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 60 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.