Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs GeForce 8800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8800 GT 8800 GT Mac Edition 8800 GTS 320 8800 GTS 512 8800 GTS 640 8800 GTS Core 112 8800 GTX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800 GTX with Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, including specs and performance data.

8800 GTX
2006, $599
768 MB GDDR3, 155 Watt
1.33

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics outperforms 8800 GTX by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
8800 GTX 8800 GTX
HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1062887
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.66no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG80no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 November 2006 (19 years ago)1 August 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores575768
Core clock speed576 MHz720 / 775 MHz
Number of transistors681 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)155 Wattno data
Texture fill rate36.86no data
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs32no data
L2 Cache96 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount768 MBno data
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1 (1.0)no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14−16
−107%
29
+107%

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how 8800 GTX and HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

  • HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is 107% faster in 900p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.33 2.42
Recency 8 November 2006 1 August 2013
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics has a 82% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
vs
HD 6570 Radeon HD 6570
HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
vs
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
vs
ATI HD 3870 Radeon HD 3870
8600 GTS 8600 GTS
vs
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
7950 GT AGP 7950 GT AGP
vs
GeForce4 MX 460 GeForce4 MX 460
7950 GT AGP 7950 GT AGP
vs
Pro V320 MxGPU Pro V320 MxGPU
7950 GT AGP 7950 GT AGP
vs
UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4
7600 GT AGP 7600 GT AGP
vs
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
7900 GTO 7900 GTO
vs
W5000 DVI W5000 DVI
7900 GTO 7900 GTO
vs
ATI HD 5870 Mac Edition HD 5870 Mac Edition
7800 GS+ AGP 7800 GS+ AGP
vs
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
7100 GS 7100 GS
vs
Graphics Graphics
7950 GT 7950 GT
vs
PRO W7800 PRO W7800

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 149 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTX or Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.