ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730 vs GeForce 8800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8800 GT 8800 GT Mac Edition 8800 GTS 320 8800 GTS 512 8800 GTS 640 8800 GTS Core 112 8800 GTX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800 GTX with Mobility Radeon HD 5730, including specs and performance data.

8800 GTX
2006, $599
768 MB GDDR3, 155 Watt
1.33
+1.5%

8800 GTX outperforms Mobility HD 5730 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
8800 GTX 8800 GTX
ATI Mobility HD 5730 Mobility HD 5730

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10621068
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.663.87
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG80Madison
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 November 2006 (19 years ago)7 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores575400
Core clock speed576 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors681 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt26 Watt
Texture fill rate36.8613.00
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs3220
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cache96 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount768 MB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.1 (1.0)1.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14−16
+0%
14
+0%
Full HD18−20
+0%
18
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how 8800 GTX and ATI Mobility HD 5730 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 900p
  • A tie in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.33 1.31
Recency 8 November 2006 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 26 Watt

8800 GTX has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score.

ATI Mobility HD 5730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 496.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 8800 GTX and Mobility Radeon HD 5730.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTX is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5730 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
vs
HD 6570 Radeon HD 6570
ATI Mobility HD 5730 Mobility Radeon HD 5730
vs
GT 550M GeForce GT 550M
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
vs
ATI HD 3870 Radeon HD 3870
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT
vs
ATI X1650 GTO Radeon X1650 GTO
8600 GT Mac Edition GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
vs
RX 580X Mobile RX 580X Mobile
8600 GTS GeForce 8600 GTS
vs
R5 430 OEM R5 430 OEM
8800 GTS 320 GeForce 8800 GTS 320
vs
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
vs
GeForce 830M GeForce 830M
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
vs
GeForce2 MX 200 PCI MX 200 PCI
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
vs
GeForce2 MX PCI MX PCI
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
vs
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
vs
GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 MX + nForce 220
7900 GTO GeForce 7900 GTO
vs
HD 6570 HD 6570

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 148 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTX or Mobility Radeon HD 5730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.