Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce 8800 GTS 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1055not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.74no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG92Spectre Lite
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 December 2007 (17 years ago)17 February 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128384
Core clock speed650 MHz554 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors754 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6013.30
Floating-point processing power0.416 TFLOPS0.4255 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs6424
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed820 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth52.48 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.0
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2007 17 February 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 90 Watt

R7 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 6 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 512 and Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS 512 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 135 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS 512 or Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.