ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs GeForce 8800 GTS 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800 GTS 512 and Radeon HD 2400 PRO, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8800 GTS 512
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 135 Watt
1.24
+377%

8800 GTS 512 outperforms HD 2400 PRO by a whopping 377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10551395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.741.05
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG92RV610
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 December 2007 (17 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12840
Core clock speed650 MHz525 MHz
Number of transistors754 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate41.602.100
Floating-point processing power0.416 TFLOPS0.042 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs644
L2 Cache64 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed820 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth52.48 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8800 GTS 512 1.24
+377%
ATI HD 2400 PRO 0.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800 GTS 512 549
+382%
Samples: 423
ATI HD 2400 PRO 114
Samples: 500

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 0.26
Recency 11 December 2007 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 20 Watt

8800 GTS 512 has a 376.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI HD 2400 PRO, on the other hand, has 575% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8800 GTS 512 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2400 PRO in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Radeon HD 2400 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 135 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 70 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS 512 or Radeon HD 2400 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.