Radeon RX Vega XL vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG80Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 February 2007 (19 years ago)8 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584
Core clock speed513 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1630 MHz
Number of transistors681 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate24.62365.1
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2064
TMUs24224
L2 Cache80 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount320 MB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed792 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2007 8 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 320 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 143 Watt 225 Watt

8800 GTS 320 has 57% lower power consumption.

RX Vega XL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 2460% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and Radeon RX Vega XL. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 31 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS 320 or Radeon RX Vega XL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.