GMA vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1604
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameG80Cloverview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 February 2007 (19 years ago)4 May 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed513 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors681 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.621.066
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPSno data
ROPs201
TMUs242
L2 Cache80 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount320 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed792 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.3ES 2.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2007 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm

GMA has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 181% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS 320 is a desktop graphics card while GMA is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 31 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS 320 or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.