Arc B580 vs GeForce 8800 GT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 8800 GT and Arc B580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc B580 outperforms 8800 GT by a whopping 3200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1057 | 107 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.03 | 91.31 |
| Power efficiency | 0.67 | 14.59 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Xe2 (2025) |
| GPU code name | G92 | BMG-G21 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 October 2007 (17 years ago) | 16 January 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $249 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Arc B580 has 304267% better value for money than 8800 GT.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 112 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 2670 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2670 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 19,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 33.60 | 427.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.336 TFLOPS | 13.67 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 80 |
| TMUs | 56 | 160 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 160 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 229 mm | 272 mm |
| Height | Single Slot | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | 2-way | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 2375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 456.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIHDTV | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 3−4
−4067%
| 125
+4067%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−3400%
| 70
+3400%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−4100%
| 42
+4100%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 116.33
−5740%
| 1.99
+5740%
|
| 1440p | 174.50
−4806%
| 3.56
+4806%
|
| 4K | 349.00
−5787%
| 5.93
+5787%
|
- Arc B580 has 5740% lower cost per frame in 1080p
- Arc B580 has 4806% lower cost per frame in 1440p
- Arc B580 has 5787% lower cost per frame in 4K
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 143
+0%
|
143
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 117
+0%
|
117
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 104
+0%
|
104
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 140
+0%
|
140
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 69
+0%
|
69
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95
+0%
|
95
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 69
+0%
|
69
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 250−260
+0%
|
250−260
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 78
+0%
|
78
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 46
+0%
|
46
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
This is how 8800 GT and Arc B580 compete in popular games:
- Arc B580 is 4067% faster in 1080p
- Arc B580 is 3400% faster in 1440p
- Arc B580 is 4100% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.14 | 37.62 |
| Recency | 29 October 2007 | 16 January 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 190 Watt |
8800 GT has 81% lower power consumption.
Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 3200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GT in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
