Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800 GS with Radeon Pro W6400, including specs and performance data.


8800 GS
2008
384 MB GDDR3, 105 Watt
0.79

Pro W6400 outperforms 8800 GS by a whopping 2449% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1208309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.5831.02
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG92Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2008 (18 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96768
Core clock speed550 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2331 MHz
Number of transistors754 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40111.9
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs4848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cache48 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount384 MB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8800 GS 0.79
Pro W6400 20.14
+2449%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800 GS 330
Samples: 108
Pro W6400 8387
+2442%
Samples: 159

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 20.14
Recency 31 January 2008 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 50 Watt

Pro W6400 has a 2449% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 967% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 983% more advanced lithography process, and 110% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or Radeon Pro W6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.