GeForce 8700M GT vs 8800 GS

Place in the ranking	1184	1368
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.57	0.79
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	G92	G84
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	31 January 2008 (17 years ago)	1 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	32
Core clock speed	550 MHz	625 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	289 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	29 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	10.00
Floating-point processing power	0.264 TFLOPS	0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs	12	8
TMUs	48	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	MXM-HE
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	384 MB	512 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	38.4 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	4.0	4.0
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	1.1	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8800 GS 0.79
+163%

8700M GT 0.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800 GS 330
+166%

8700M GT 124

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
God of War	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
God of War	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
God of War	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
God of War	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 29 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.79	0.30
Recency	31 January 2008	1 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount	384 MB	512 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	29 Watt

8800 GS has a 163.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

8700M GT, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 262.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8800 GS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8700M GT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce 8800 GS

GeForce 8700M GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 8800 GS

GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Intel Graphics 24EU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

4.6 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or GeForce 8700M GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.