Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.58
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG92Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date31 January 2008 (18 years ago)13 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores641280
Core clock speed500 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors754 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate16.00100.0
Floating-point processing power0.16 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3280
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed799 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.14 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 85 Watt

Pro 5300M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 23.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition and Radeon Pro 5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 190 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition or Radeon Pro 5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.