ATI Radeon HD 4700 vs GeForce 8700M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1364not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.79no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG84RV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2007 (18 years ago)11 February 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32320
Core clock speed625 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors289 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0019.20
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data193 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2007 11 February 2010
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 50 Watt

8700M GT has 72.4% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 4700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8700M GT and Radeon HD 4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8700M GT is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
GeForce 8700M GT
ATI Radeon HD 4700
Radeon HD 4700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 35 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8700M GT or Radeon HD 4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.