ATI Radeon HD 4700 vs GeForce 8400M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1429not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG86RV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)11 February 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16320
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors210 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20019.20
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cache16 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data193 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 11 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 50 Watt

8400M GS has 355% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 4700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GS and Radeon HD 4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4700 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GS or Radeon HD 4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.