RTX A4000 vs GeForce 8700M GT SLI

Place in the ranking	1146	56
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.95	25.09
Architecture	G8x (2007)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	NB8E-SE	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	18 September 2007 (17 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	6144
Core clock speed	625 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	578 Million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	140 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	299.5
Floating-point processing power	no data	19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	96
TMUs	no data	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−6233%

190−200

+6233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −6233%	190−200 +6233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6233%	190−200 +6233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −5900%	60−65 +5900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −6150%	750−800 +6150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −5733%	350−400 +5733%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −6190%	1950−2000 +6190%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −6233%	190−200 +6233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6233%	190−200 +6233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −5900%	60−65 +5900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −6150%	750−800 +6150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −5733%	350−400 +5733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −5900%	600−650 +5900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −6190%	1950−2000 +6190%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −6233%	190−200 +6233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6233%	190−200 +6233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −6150%	750−800 +6150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −5733%	350−400 +5733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −5900%	600−650 +5900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −6190%	1950−2000 +6190%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −5900%	60−65 +5900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −5900%	60−65 +5900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −5900%	60−65 +5900%
Hitman 3	7−8 −5614%	400−450 +5614%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −6150%	250−260 +6150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−6233%

190−200

+6233%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −5900%	60−65 +5900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−5900%

120−130

+5900%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.79	50.38
Recency	18 September 2007	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	80 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	140 Watt

8700M GT SLI has 141.4% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000, on the other hand, has a 6277.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8700M GT SLI is a notebook card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.