GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs 8700M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8700M GT SLI and GeForce Go 7900 GTX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8700M GT SLI
2007
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.68
+13.3%

8700M GT SLI outperforms Go 7900 GTX by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11641187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.931.06
ArchitectureG8x (2007)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNB8E-SEG71
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 September 2007 (17 years ago)18 April 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6432
Core clock speed625 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data500 MHz
Number of transistors578 Million278 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the 8700M GT SLI is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 8700M GT SLI is ahead in 14 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.60
Recency 18 September 2007 18 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 45 Watt

8700M GT SLI has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

Go 7900 GTX, on the other hand, has 28.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8700M GT SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7900 GTX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
GeForce 8700M GT SLI
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce Go 7900 GTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8700M GT SLI or GeForce Go 7900 GTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.