Radeon RX 5900 XT vs GeForce 8600M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1435not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.81no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG86Navi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2007 (18 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164352
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1735 MHz
Number of transistors210 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600471.9
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPS15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8272
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 300 Watt

8600M GS has 1400% lower power consumption.

RX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600M GS and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600M GS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
GeForce 8600M GS
AMD Radeon RX 5900 XT
Radeon RX 5900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 70 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600M GS or Radeon RX 5900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.